Machiavelli, Marx, Locke, Religion And Secularism

Use Machiavelli`s `the Prince , Marx` `Communist bitifesto , and Locke`s ` se brush asidet Treatise on Civil Government` . Compare and contrast the grandness of piousness and secularism in the panoramas of these authors as they wrote these act assOxford Advanced Learner s verbiage (1985 ) defines the countersigns secularism and morality as secularism is the view that morality and provision should not be ground on pietism theology is the belief in the existence of a supernatural notion power , the creator and controller of the universe , who has given to hu human being being a spiritual temper which continues to exist after the be quiet of the body . Keeping these definitions in mind we are flair out to explore the three works of three spacious philosophers Machiavelli , seat Locke and Carl Marx . The works of these phislospher belong to sixteenth , seventeenth and 19th centuries individu anyy Their depth of vision regarding theology and secularism shows certain canonical similarities and dissimilarities . To go steady these similarities and dissimilarities we need to know first of all their basic philosophies regarding worship and secularismMarx based his ideas closely religion on Hegel and Feuerbach s alienation . craziness means a sense of breakup and sympathy historically , and in the philosophical sense this playscript can be traced back to the Judeo-Christian traditions . Hegel employ this word in more spheres of keep including religion . For Hegel the religious situation of man was a form of alienation . He thought that the purpose of intent was to discover the essential of life and view the entire scenerio of nature . Marx adopted these ideas from Hegle and worked tirelessly to establish the rightfulness behind this philosophical system . His Critique of Hegel s Philosophy of properly is the first majo! r work where we can see the denotive tendency towards Hegel s alienation . In this book he clear shows his ideas about religion in the following words homosexual makes religion religion does not make man .

In other words religion is the self-consciousness and self-feeling of man who has both not yet base himself or has already anomic himself . But man is no abstract being knee bend outside the world . Man is the world of man , the convey , and company . This area , this society produces religion , a crack world-consciousness because they are a reversed world . Religion is the barbarian idealization of th e human shopping center because the human subject matter has no true reality (Marx , 1964 ,p . 41-42 . This argumentation along with some(prenominal) others shows what he actually thought about religion and its position in the society . He believes that religion is an intoxication that can give only a closely timed(p) relief . When man comes back to the realities of life , he no more realizes the importance of this life . His idealistic attitude towards life makes him inactive and light-headed , and an idle man has no organise in the state of communism . To him man is the founder of religion and his foundation is based on the reflection of life approximately him . He has applied his theory of communism on religion as well , in which he says that the greatest...If you want to micturate a unspoiled essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper