Electoral college.

The Electoral College frame works well in most picks. However, the call for reform is heard after almost all(prenominal) election. in that respect are three major weaknesses in the ashes that could affect the issuance of an election. Winner take all is the main problem extinct of these three. If a offerdidate evolves the lifesizest number of popular right to ballotings in a state, that person suck ups all the states electoral votes most of the time. In the rare case, a vista will provided pay up for part of the electoral votes. Critics argue that this constitution is unfair to those who voted for a losing groundworkdidate. For example, in 1992 more than 2 million Texans voted for Bill Clinton, only when Clinton did not discover any of Texass electoral votes. He legitimate 2 million votes from the popular; however, he did not receive any of the electoral votes out of 32. 32 of the electoral votes can play a significant role in the election. Sometimes, the ca ndidate would only deliver the goods by a margin vote like 1 or 2.That why many crapper are criticizing this system. Also the winner take all system makes it possible for a candidate who loses the popular vote to win the electoral vote. This usually happens when a candidate wins several enlarged states by narrow margins. Totally, there were eighteen times in the American History.

The first time was in the elections of John Quincy Adams in 1824. He only stock 30.6% of the popular; however, he legitimate most of the electoral votes, 84 votes. So he at last became the president. That is really often happened. The last time happened was the election in 2000. George W.! Bush only received 47.9% of popular votes notwithstanding he received 271 out of 538 electoral votes. So he conform to the constitutional requirement, majority of electoral... If you want to get a luxuriant essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper