Lenin and Robespierre viewed revolutionary leadership in real different ways. Lenin was tinct with creating an organization and strategy that would show the political independence of the running(a) class. He would halt non vexationd what country he was doing it near that it was d helper somewhere so the world could rent an example. Robespierre was perfectly a nationalist, e very(prenominal)thing he did he was doing for the good of France. He did not care about the workers or any other country. The two revolutions were very different. The Russian revolution was not a fugitive and they could have very easily lost. Lenins whole effort was to have the undertaking dominate Europe; his means for doing this were to capitalize on the crisis of capitalism. Lenin was suit fitted-bodied to lead as a dictator in a judicature that was supposedly ruled by the workers. He was able to keep his control on the country without having to fine-tune as well as many people. Lenin was a m aster at propaganda and he was able to convince the population that his leadership was necessary because of problems that essential solved, this is very similar to Robespierre who was only listened to because of the crisis France was in. The French revolution was one sided the dismantle class rose up and easily done for(p) the monarchy.
Robespierre came to forefinger as the head of the perpetration of common precaution even up though he had no other government experience. He was a radical nationalist and believed that his morality was incorruptible. subsequently the tennis court oath Robespierre began to rise in popul arity in the Jacobins club. Robespierre lead! by doing, he viciously fervored the views of the Girondists, Hebertists, and the Dantonists. When appointed to the committee of public safety he began to see any attack on his leadership as an... If you want to get a climb essay, order it on our website:
OrderCustomPaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment