Political Islam Essay

The constant failure of westerly secular ideologies to have a resolve for the problems facing humanity has given birth to the political side of Islam. Since its inception in to the world, western principles have done nothing but abuse and brutalize Moslem doctrines, traditions, values, and culture. To add to a greater extent(prenominal) aggravate to injury, western ideologies have implanted a fake sound of progress to Islam in its failure to nail the economic conditions of Islamic societies and nations. Given the extra-religious motivations, political Islam or more ideally known as Islamic fundamentalism is fueled by a multitude of concerns that pollute Islam in numerous ways possible.In invest to expound the symptoms that lead to the foundations of Islamic political sight, John Esposito lists down and discusses varying frameworks for such phenomenon. He setoff explains the failure brought about by the secular philosophies justifies Islams legitimacy as an alternative form o f political orientation in governments and societies. Esposito simply suggests that the Muslims weednot be blamed if ever they result to assertly unorthodox ways to subsidize because the only choice left for them is to look for another non-corruptive option to uplift their worsening economic, cultural, and moral sectionalisation (Eposito, 2000).Esposito also cont mop ups that the role of armed forces such as the Taliban in Afghanistan have made a alert role in setting the course for Islamic fundamentalisms resurgence (Eposito, 2000). The resurfacing of Islam in a more extreme manner has its root cause in other angles apart from the contributions of heterogeneous militia forces. Primarily, the elevation and dominance of Judeo-Christian traditions in various sects around the world is a plausible angle, this is because Judaism and Christianity have peculiar(a) doctrines which are at odds with Islam. Though they do not attack places of worship, Muslims still violate Christian a nd Jewish laws through their radical behavior.John Esposito (2000) implies that Islam or Islamic Fundamentalism for that content is a case of civilization collision between two different civilizations. He furthers that the rising run of righteousness in orbiculate affairs contributes to the conflicts of civilizations. In this particular argument, Esposito attempts to generalize the role of religion in other endeavors, but religion has its own interests to pursue. In Islams case, how can its adherents postulate a world order if the doctrines that highly influence their ways of life are incoherent?The clash of civilizations theory is just as the same as clash of interests. If a person does not concur with the concept of a particular ideology it is his or her prerogative to disagree and not conform to it. Espositos framework in this sense is as wide-eyed as the United States refusal to embrace the concept of communism and the Soviet cause during the 1950s. Osama bin Laden for ins tance, expresses a great deal of resentment over the United States and its ideologies, thats how he justifies his acts of terrorism in various cities and countries, but if he wants to claim Islam as the world order, he is then misguided by his alleged advocacies that would save the world.Democracys main concept is freedom nation refuses to be shackled by laws that hinder progress. Religion meanwhile has its own foundations based on what is morally right and morally wrong. It is instead considerable how Esposito gives a non-biased discussion of whether there is conflict of interest between Islam and democracy. He concludes that politics is more influential here and not religion, and that failure to support civil society as well as failure to participate in political affairs strengthens religious and secular authoritarianism (Esposito 2000).It is plausible to theorise that there can be a mediating factor between Islam and democracy this is due to the fact that two ideologies have a similar cause, which is to pursue the best interests of the people. It is quite true that Islam and its conformists are on the receiving end of western immoralities however, it is a persons own will whether to conform to what certain aspects of western ideologies imply. Furthermore, although Islam and democracy may have some overlapping and conflicting principles, a certain application of mutual obligingness is possible to satisfy all angles in conflict.In Light of John Espositos article regarding the resurrection of the Islamic resentment over western secular ideologies, a number of questions are raised to address the matter How is terrorism justified as a counter-measure against the perceived immoral and corruptive nature of western thought? In what context and up to what extent does evil apply in western ideologies? If Mohammed were alive today, would he be having a similar response to the nature of western views as modern political Islam conformists do? Do the Political Islam ists simply advocate for the upholding of Islams tenets or do they also thirst for global power in other aspects such political and economic? If Islam in itself postulates a diversity of beliefs, how can Islamic fundamentalists constitute their very core ideas in to the world?